Top College News Subscribe to the Newsletter

*UPDATE* SGA releases statement on anti-abortion presentation

Genocide Awareness Project approved for SGA funds, allocated $1,000

Published: Wednesday, February 24, 2010

Updated: Monday, March 1, 2010 15:03

GAP

Megan VanWaus

Jazmine Rodriguez, chair of the Student Government Association Services and Public Relations Committee, has released a statement concerning the situation with the Genocide Awareness Project and SGA funds:

"On Wednesday, January 13th, 2010, members of the Financial Allocations for Organizations Committee funded a speaker to attend Students for Life's Genocide Awareness Project. Students for Life is a registered student organization and is eligible for funding, as are all registered student organizations. Students for Life was funded to bring a speaker to their Genocide Awareness Project which was said to be taking place Tuesday, February 16th and February, January 17th.

The images portrayed outside of the Student Union were in no means funded by the Student Senate. The organization paid for those materials through their own means and did not present the controversial posters to Senate when the organization applied for funding. Furthermore, the Student Senate was also not aware of the content that would be presented at the display outside of the Student Union. As stated previously, the Student Senate did not allocate any funds towards posters or promotional materials, but only to a speaker.

The Student Senate, also known as the legislative branch of the UCF Student Government Association, is composed of fifty-two student leaders who are elected by the student body each year. The Senate works with students and represents them to the administration and to each of their colleges. The Senate also works with the many student organizations on our campus to provide them with the funds necessary for travel, conference registration, and event planning for organizational events or conferences."

 

. . .

An allocation of $1,000 from the Student Government Association helped to bring the controversial Genocide Awareness Project to campus last week.

The display included large signs and posters depicting unborn or aborted fetuses along with images of recognizable massacres, including Cambodian killing fields, the World Trade Center attack, the Holocaust and other  acts of mass violence.

SGA Comptroller Shane Chism said the SGA Financial Allocations for Organizations Committee allocated $1,000 to the group  Students for Life in order to pay costs for hosting the project.

Students for Life is an anti-abortion student organization on campus.

The group petitioned for $6,500 in order to bring the project to UCF. The FAO Committee approved a total of $1,000.

Chism said the group requested funding for expenses including transportation, housing, staff and volunteers, food and supplies, communication, training, education and mailing.

 Erica DeSanti, SGA senator and chair of the FAO Committee, said Students for Life has not been previously funded to bring the Genocide Awareness Project to campus.

She said that while groups shouldn't be denied funds due to political stance, the committee needs to know the content that a speaker will be bringing.

"The organizations should get promotional materials approved through the Operations Review Committee in order to get the SGA stamp of approval, from now on," DeSanti said.

Surprised by the approved funding by the FAO Committee, specifically for training costs, SGA Comptroller Shane Chism, addressed the issue at an SGA meeting held Feb. 18.

Chism recommended that the senate pay more attention to funding.
Chism also said that SGA remains unbiased regarding which organizations and events they financially support.

According to the committees of the senate Web site, the FAO Committee is responsible for overseeing the Senate Working Fund, the Speakers Account and the Office Supplies Account. It allocates money from these accounts to registered student organizations and hears all allocations and bills for events, performances, etc. on campus.

Mark Harrington, executive director for the Center for Bio-Ethical Reform Midwest, said the project has not received financial support from SGA or any campus organization.

"We haven't been given a penny," Harrington said.

The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform is a multimillion dollar organization that funds and organizes anti-abortion projects, including the Genocide Awareness Project.

"It is a privately funded organization with some very wealthy donors in the Orlando area and the state of Florida," Harrington said.

Students for Life president, Nicholas DiDonna, said that the project will be receiving the funds sometime this week after paperwork is filled out between Students for Life, the Genocide Awareness Project and the Activity & Service Fee Business Office.
Part of the funds that went to Students for Life helped finance a Pro-life Institute Night, held Feb. 12. Volunteers with the Genocide Awareness Project taught those who attended about how to discuss the issues with students.

Many Students for Life members helped volunteers of the project talk about the displays on campus on Wednesday and Thursday.

DiDonna said he felt the project benefited students.

"It raised awareness and got people talking," he said. "It gave the students an outlet to discuss pregnancy and abortion. What better way to start the discussion than putting it in front of them and confronting them with issue?"

DiDonna said some students felt offended and trapped by the images and felt the comparison of genocide and abortion was unwarranted.

"My response to that is that the project was only there for two days. It gave students those two days to put some time and consideration into their thoughts about abortion," he said.

Despite some negative reactions to the displays, DiDonna said he thought the event went well.

"A good portion of students on campus were open to it and glad," DiDonna said.
DiDonna said genocide is a crisis.

"Our intention was never to rub that crisis in students' faces, but to show the similarities between abortion and genocide and to get them to consider the issue," he said.

Recommended: Articles that may interest you

13 comments

Anonymous
Tue Mar 30 2010 16:10
I'm not afraid to deal with the subject of abortion; in fact, I am more than happy to do it. If they want to come on campus and make their presentation, they can have at it. My issue is the fact that I was essentially forced to help finance their operation. If SGA allocated funds to this organization, and is not providing the same opportunity to pro choice groups, it becomes a form of compelled speech, which is unconstitutional. THAT IS THE CONSTITUTION. I would advise the anonymous poster (Thurs, Feb 25 2010, 10:04) to get his constitutional facts straight before he/she attacks our patriotism.
Anonymous
Mon Mar 8 2010 01:26
I saw little kids passing out fliers. that is just f'ed up
Andrew Stein
Thu Mar 4 2010 00:47
THIS IS RIDICULOUS. I WILL BRING SGA DOWN ON ITS KNEES AND MAKE THEM PAY FOR NOT PUTTING ME ON SENATE
Thomas Adriaan Hellinger
Wed Mar 3 2010 19:00
@Anon - I agree GAP had a right to do what it did, it did not necessarily have the right to our funding however. I will admit there is a sticky issue around the fair distribution of SGA funds, but ideas that are repulsive must be confronted with. Ignoring ideas allows them to propagate, and these backward ideas are harmful. They should be confronted and shown to be nothing more than elevated ignorance.
Anonymous
Wed Mar 3 2010 18:40
Everyone has the right to free speech. I have to deal with peoples bumper stickers, offensive language and offensive t-shirts everyday.. Just look the other way and ignore if you dont like it.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 2 2010 12:53
time to vote these people out
Anonymous
Tue Mar 2 2010 12:52
Google "The Only Moral Abortion is MY Abortion," a great article of compiled stories of anti-abortionists who protested outside of clinics, were prominent members in pro-life clubs, but when THEY (or their daughters) were faced with an unplanned pregnancy, they went ahead and got it. These individuals usually went right back to their pro-life demonstrations afterwards. It's funny how these anti-abortionists will say one thing, but act very differently when placed in the same situation. Being pro-life is all about an image, not actually about caring about life. If they really cared about human life, why not volunteer or be part of groups that help the disadvantaged and poor people already alive? Someone in the Peace Corps actually makes a difference; an anti-abortionist could care less.
Anonymous
Tue Mar 2 2010 12:40
That display is offensive and should never have been allowed without proper warning in such a frequented place. I for one have had a recent abortion that I regret very much and seeing this made me want to throw up. Like someone else said, this should have been set up in a private room where those who WANT to view it, can. No one should be forced to look at these images as they walk to class especially when there was no consideration given to the fact that a great deal of women on our campus have had abortions. I pay more then most for out of state tuition and to know that my money is funding projects such a these is truly horrific.
Anon
Tue Mar 2 2010 01:34
I have no problem with this sort of display, but the Student Union is not the right place for this sort of presentation because people walk through the Student Union to reach their classes. Plus the display wasn't properly warned around the student union as there should've been signs inside the union warning people of graphic images.

Not everyone likes being woken up in the morning to pictures of gory corpses of fetuses dripping with blood as if ripped from a mother's stomach by Jack the Ripper and thrown onto a coffee table to rot like road kill for a few close-up photos that'll eventually show up on a college campus. How about we just play the Saw series outside the union next? That'll turn a few heads.

Anonymous
Tue Mar 2 2010 00:18
Here's a good project for some resourceful investigative reporter to undertake: conduct a comprehensive review of how SGA funds have been allocated during the years for which those records still exist to see if they have been distributed "fairly" according to SGA guidelines. It would be interesting to discover which registered student organizations have received the most or least funds each year and as a cumulative total, and maybe who has and who hasn't been getting all that they were "entitled" to receive. Inquiring minds want to know.
Brian
Mon Mar 1 2010 17:08
I have no problem considering the issue of abortion being genocide, but NOT AT SCHOOL OUTSIDE. If this was done in a room where people could come and go, that would be fine. But I had to walk past there to get to where I was going. It was disruptive and wrong. Shame on UCF.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 11:07
That presentation was despicable. It made me decide to be pro-choice.
Anonymous
Thu Feb 25 2010 10:04
Beware what you ask for; if funding is denied one group because of the content of material addressed, all funding for campus groups will be denied, no matter what the content of material addressed. THAT IS THE CONSTITUTION. You live under that Constitution and appreciate your freedom; don't give away your freedom just because you are afraid to deal with the subject of abortion.






log out